The Supreme Court is currently grappling with the extent of First Amendment rights in the realm of social media. Recently, the nine justices heard cases questioning whether states can compel social media platforms to adhere to censorship regulations, even when the platforms consider certain posts to be objectionable or hateful.
Which cases did the Supreme Court hear?
In response to the events of January 6 at the U.S. Capitol, Texas and Florida enacted laws asserting that social media companies were unfairly censoring conservative users and restricting the methods by which these platforms moderate content. The legality of these laws has been challenged by trade groups representing social media companies, with the Supreme Court set to make a definitive ruling.
Why is this so important?
Legal experts are calling this a landmark First Amendment case, as it raises crucial questions about the role of government in regulating content on social media platforms. Chief Justice John Roberts pondered whether the state should dictate what is permissible in the modern public square.
Which social media platforms does this cover?
The scope of this ruling remains unclear, with uncertainties surrounding whether it applies to platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and Twitter, or even services like Uber or Venmo. The Supreme Court’s decision is expected to primarily impact major social media platforms.
When will the Court give their answers?
Typically, the Supreme Court announces its rulings in the summer, before the end of the Court’s term. While an earlier decision is possible, it’s best not to anticipate it.


